Campagne internationale de boycott des multinationales des USA |
||
|
Page d'accueil | Qui sommes-nous? | Infoblog | Matériel de campagne | E-boutique | Faire un don | Bénévoles | Liens | Nous contacter | ||
|
Au moins 10 bonnes raisons de boycotter les USA > #1 Irak Cette page n'est pas disponible en français. War and occupation in IraqLast update: November 20, 2006 Iraq war blamed for 600,000 Iraqi deathsThe Human Cost of the War in Iraq, A Mortality Study, 2002-2006 .BAGHDAD - BALTIMORE - October 12, 2006 -- The School of Medicine at Al Mustansiriya University in Baghdad, Iraq, and The Bloomberg School of Public Health at Johns Hopkins University--in cooperation with MIT's Center for International Studies--have released a report on the under-examined question of civilian deaths in Iraq since the U.S. invasion in March 2003. Its central conclusion, based on a population-based survey conducted at some risk by a team of Iraqi and American public health researchers, is that approximately 600,000 people have died violently above the normal mortality rate. Including non-violent deaths that are nevertheless linked to the war, the total is estimated to be more than 650,000. Source: MIT Center for International Studies More information: Who has got weapons of mass destruction?Despite the Bush administration’s claimed that the war on Iraq was only about weapons of mass destruction, simmering below the surface is Bush’s ‘need’ to secure a continued supply of cheap oil.
The two main underlying reasons for the war on Iraq—the alleged terrorist connections of the regime and its possession of weapons of mass destruction—were revealed as hollow, Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) said in its annual yearbook, a widely recognized research institute. In 2004 the Iraq Survey Group (ISG) completed its inspection and investigation activities into alleged nuclear, biological and chemical (NBC) weapon programmes and weapon-related activities in Iraq. In October the ISG released a substantial unclassified report on the search for such weapons and its findings. This caused problems for many democracies with troops in Iraq. Some, such as Hungary and Spain, withdrew their forces and others considered doing so—adding to the fragility of the situation. The same year in the US presidential election campaign, the two main parties offered little alternative thinking in the main security-related areas—Iraq, homeland security and intelligence reform. Nationally led ‘coalitions of the willing’ of the kind that undertook the military actions in Afghanistan (2002) and Iraq (2003) pose the greatest structural challenges of all for parliamentary oversight, since the interstate component of decision making is not carried out through an established, transparent multilateral institutional process. The basic question is, of course, what rights parliaments should have, but their near-exclusion from the sensitive judgements surrounding intervention seems incongruous in an age that generally emphasises democracy. Sources:
No war for oil!
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Le site BoycottBush.org est hébergé par For Mother Earth | Webmaster |